Wednesday 9 July 1997

The Antidote to Snakebite

This is the first chapter of my booklet Kshanti, originally given as part of a series of talks at the London Buddhist Centre in 1997

In the novel "Kim" by Rudyard Kipling, one of the main characters is a Tibetan Lama. Kim becomes his disciple or chela and the Lama, who is an artist, paints a picture of the Wheel of Life so that he can use it to teach Kim.

"When the shadows shortened and the lama leaned more heavily upon Kim, there was always the Wheel of Life to draw forth, to hold flat under wiped stones, and with a long straw to expound cycle by cycle. Here sat the Gods on high - and they were dreams of dreams. Here was our Heaven and the world of the demi-Gods - horsemen fighting among the hills. Here were the agonies done upon the beasts, souls ascending or descending the ladder and therefore not to be interfered with. Here were the Hells, hot and cold, and the abodes of tormented ghosts. Let the chela study the troubles that come forth from overeating - bloated stomach and burning bowels. Obediently then, with bowed head and brown finger alert to follow the pointer, did the chela study."(1)

The Tibetan Wheel of Life is a very comprehensive symbol of the world, a symbol of our minds and our lives, both individually and collectively. In the centre are a cock, a pig and a snake, biting each others tails. They represent the mental poisons of greed, hatred and spiritual ignorance which are the forces that keep us going round and round in circles of suffering and unsatisfactoriness. The pig represents spiritual ignorance, the unwillingness to recognise that actions have consequences, that it is possible to dwell in higher states of consciousness and that all things are impermanent. The cock represents greed or craving. According to Sangharakshita this is a state "in which the self or ego reaches out towards the non-self or non-ego with a view to appropriating and even incorporating it, thus filling the yawning pit of its own inner poverty and emptiness."(2)
The snake represents hatred, ill will and anger. Hatred is the desire to destroy whatever prevents us from possessing the things or people we crave. The snake of ill-will lashes out with its venom at whatever gets in the way of its greedy desires.(3)

Kshanti is the antidote to snakebite, the antidote to hatred, ill will, resentment, jealousy, anger and a lot of other poisonous mental states. Kshanti is a term with many meanings. It is a Sanskrit word with no exact English equivalent, but it means patience, forbearance and forgiveness. In his book "The Drama of Cosmic Enlightenment" Sangharakshita, who as a Buddhist and scholar is very careful to give both the spirit and letter in elucidating the meaning of words, enlarges on this;
It means patience: patience with people, patience when things don't go your way. It means tolerance: allowing other people to have their own thoughts, their own ideas, their own beliefs, even their own prejudices. It means love and kindliness. And it also means openness , willingness to take things in, and, especially, receptivity to higher spiritual truths."(4)
Hatred or ill will is with us all the time, from the mild irritation and annoyance we experience at not getting our own way, to self-hatred, outbursts of anger, jealousy, competitiveness, narrow-minded rationalism, racism, ideological politics and so on. Ill will manifests itself in all sorts of ways and a glance at any newspaper will confirm how ubiquitous it is (not that newspapers give a particularly balanced account of the world we live in). There is murder, rape, child abuse, warfare, ethnic cleansing and bigotry of all sorts. Then, on the more personal level, there are the jealousies of lovers and former lovers, the breakdown of relationships between parents and children, the anger of motorists and pedestrians, the harsh words of political rivals, the petty back-biting of office politics and so on. Lack of self-esteem which is ill-will towards ourselves is also very widespread.

Sangharakshita makes a distinction between two different kinds of anger. (5) There is the anger of frustration which wants to remove all obstacles to communication. This can be very good. It is energy that wants to move beyond limitation. Then there is the anger of rage or hatred which wants to remove the person. This is anger out of control. The point is that anger is not necessarily a bad thing, but usually we do not maintain enough awareness to be able to direct it positively. The anger of frustration can easily tip over into the anger of rage and hatred. And of course there is not just anger which is demonstrative but also anger which is quiet. Quiet anger is characterised by incessant obsessive thoughts which may manifest as stubbornness or an 'atmosphere' of ill will. Sometimes people on the spiritual path think that they should not be angry and try to bury or dismiss any anger that arises. However, it is necessary to experience anger in order to transform it. To experience it does not mean to express it. We do not need to scorch others with the sparks of our anger. It is not a case of express it or repress it but rather a case of experience and transform it.

There are a multitude of forms in which hatred or ill will manifests within us and all around us. We are often taking offence or seeking revenge. There is a verbal sniping that goes on in even the most polite circles that is often nothing more than ill-will dressed up as wit or humour. Do we need to take offence, even when offence is given? Do we have to get our own back, even when we have been badly treated? Do we have a choice in how to respond? How can we withstand the poisonous darts of our own anger and the ill-will of others? Obviously we do have a choice. Otherwise we are simply controlled by the moods of other people, like puppets jerking crazily on fraying strings. If we are to make choices we need to be aware of the choice before us and we need to feel motivated to choose what is most beneficial. To develop awareness of our choice of responses and the ability to choose a response we will have to make an effort. Awareness does not just descend upon us because we think it is a good idea. Awareness develops gradually as we make an effort to cultivate it, through meditation, reflection and observation. To be motivated sufficiently to want to broaden and deepen our awareness we need to engage our emotions. Emotions are energy. Where our emotions tend is where our energy goes. Therefore we need to develop energy to deal with hatred and anger. In Buddhist terms we need Virya, the energy which transforms negative emotion and actions into positivity and benign activity. Kshanti, the antidote to the snakebite of hatred and ill will, is not something passive or anaemic. It is an energetic quality. It requires strength and robustness. It requires stamina and endurance. We cannot allow ourselves to be put off or dispirited by minor setbacks or upsets.

All too often we are lacking in stamina. Do we have sufficient motivation or vision to rouse us to heroic effort? Politicians for instance seem to have tremendous stamina. People in theatre or pop stars have stamina. In the world of business people exert themselves strenuously. It seems that when people are motivated enough they can perform great feats of energetic striving. Often the motivation is quite selfish in character. To lead a life centred around spiritual values we need that kind of stamina too. We need it in order to make the consistent effort that personal development demands and we need it if we are to be of help to others. As Sangharakshita puts it;

We are so effete in the spiritual life, more often than not. We can’t
stand any sort of strain; after any bit of extra effort we have to go
away and rest, have a little holiday, sit down for a while, play a
record and take things easy. Its pathetic! Here you are, aspiring to gain Enlightenment, which is after all the most difficult
thing you can possibly propose to yourself, and look how easily one
usually takes it - what an easy time one gives oneself. And there, [[on
the other hand]] are people aiming at the very inferior, trivial, easily
attained things like the Presidency of the United States. Just look at
the massive effort they are putting in - it puts us to shame!’(6)

Perhaps you think he is exaggerating for effect. I don't think so. I
think he is probably even sugaring the pill. If you read the life of
Sangharakshita or of other great Buddhists or remarkable practitioners
from other spiritual traditions, you will find they all had great
stamina and the ability and willingness to make consistent effort in
pursuit of their goals. How can we develop stamina? The answer is with
practice. If we are to develop stamina we need to learn how to endure discomfort, whether it is physical discomfort or emotional discomfort. Endurance is an aspect of Kshanti. The Dhammapada uses the image of an elephant as a simile for endurance. It says: "I will endure words that hurt in silent peace as the strong elephant endures in battle arrows sent by the bow, for many people lack self-control.’(7)


The quality of endurance is not very popular these days. Comfort and instant gratification are hallmarks of our society. Endurance and the ability to postpone gratification of desires are hallmarks of the spiritual life. In his book "The Sibling
Society", Robert Bly argues that people no longer want to grow up and face the difficulties of adulthood. Instead we are creating what he calls a sibling society, a society of adolescents which demands little in the way of responsibility and difficult work. He says;
"When enough people have slid backward into a sibling state of mind,
society can no longer demand difficult and subtle work from its people -
because the standards are no longer visible. Without the labour of
artists, for example, to incorporate past achievements - in brushwork,
in treatment of light, in depth of emotion, in mythological intensity -
people with some talent can pretend to be genuine artists. Their choices
seem to be to cannibalise ancient art, or to create absurdly ugly art
that "makes a statement". They don't ask themselves or each other for
depth or intensity, and most contemporary critics pretend not to miss
them. Bly goes on to define an adult as "a person not governed by the demands for immediate pleasure, comfort and excitement."
And in confessional tone he says "The adult quality that has been hardest for me, as a greedy person, to understand is renunciation. The older I get, the more beautiful the word renunciation seems to me."(8)
If Bly is right, then we have the task of not only counteracting our own tendencies to shy away from everything uncomfortable, but also the task of going against a strong trend in the society around us. We need to be on out mettle. Nothing worthwhile is achieved without dedicated effort and willingness to endure whatever privations occur along the way. If we want to achieve anything worthwhile with our lives we need to learn to endure and thereby build stamina. Sangharakshita touches on this when he says:

Perhaps our daily routine should be such that we are strengthened
rather than weakened. Not too many mornings lying in bed; not taking
things too easily; not too many holidays; not too many visits to the
cinema. Quite apart from the question of distraction, all this can be
very weakening. Under modern conditions we can end up rather weak
creatures if we are not careful. We very rarely have to work hard day
after day, week after week, month after month, as many people in the
world still have to do just to survive.” (9)

And we certainly rarely work that hard or with that much indifference to inconvenience for the sake of spiritual values and principles. The elephant of endurance is not disturbed or put off by a few criticisms or by people being difficult. Endurance depends on a higher vision which sustains us through the discomforts of spiritual development. In order to cultivate stamina and strength of mind we will need to develop emotional positivity and clarity of thought. Emotional positivity is developed most directly through the Metta Bhavana meditation practice. In this practice we systematically cultivate the emotion of universal loving-kindness. It is a simple and extremely effective practice. It is best to learn this or any meditation practice from a teacher. However there are some excellent books available now which can help. I would recommend ‘Meditating’ by Jinananda.(10)

Positive emotion, as developed by the practice of Metta Bhavana is a necessary basis for clear thinking, because all of our thinking is influenced and permeated by our emotional states. Usually we just let our minds wander around, like slightly demented characters, picking up bits and pieces here and there. Then we construct all sorts of views and opinions out of these bits and pieces and imagine that we've had some ideas. Most of our ideas are not our own, but simply an amalgam of various things we've heard or read, put together by our conditioned prejudices, to create a world view that keeps us reasonably sane.

To develop clear thinking we need to become aware of the extent to which all our thinking is influenced by the conditions which have surrounded us since birth. Although we may like to think of ourselves as independent-minded and wise to the world, we are more likely to be completely immersed in views and ideas that we simply ingested from the world around us in the same way that we learnt to speak. In fact the analogy with learning to speak is not just an analogy, because the very language bears the imprint of ideas in it which we accept unquestioningly until something erupts in our experience that makes us sit up and take notice. In Buddhist terms it is not sufficient however for us to analyse of deconstruct language.

What we really need to do is develop greater mindfulness. We need to become much more aware of the influences and ideas which we are constantly imbibing. What we feed into our minds is what comes out as views and opinions If we feed our minds on a daily dose of newspapers and television, that is what will have the biggest influence on our thinking. If we feast our minds on something which communicates broader and higher perspectives then that will begin to form the basis for our thinking and that would be an altogether healthier diet for us. It
is not just the content of what we read that affects out thinking but also the style. If we read books that are written by people who can think and express themselves clearly, that will help us to clarify our own thinking and expression.


Thinking clearly requires objectivity. To be objective we need to be able to distinguish opinions from facts. This is not necessarily very common. A simple example is the way people say something like ‘its a terrible day’ when what they mean is ‘its raining’. The ‘terrible day’ is a value judgment and a matter of opinion. The rain is a fact. So in order to be objective and therefore truthful we need to be able to tell what is a value judgment or opinion and what is a fact. So for instance when we use terms like ‘always’ and ‘ever’ as in "I'm always last to know what's going on" or "Nobody ever listens to me" we are probably being poetic rather than factual. But its important for us to realise that, otherwise we start to believe ourselves on an emotional level and that can have significant consequences. I'm not suggesting that we should never use idiomatic speech, but rather that we should try to be clear about what is subjective and what is objective in our communication. Often we hold very strongly to our views and this is for very subjective, emotional reasons and one way of beginning to loosen our
attachment to views is to start to see the element of subjectivity and emotionality and try to distinguish that from what is objective and factual. The basic wrong view that we all suffer under is the view that we are a fixed and separate self or ego-identity and this conditions most of our other views. This sense of fixed, separate selfhood, is the fundamental prejudice from which all others flow. To begin to undermine or attenuate this view we need to approach it from many angles. We need to cultivate positive emotion, we need to practise generosity, we need to immerse ourselves in Buddhist study, we need to experience solitude and we need to make an effort to distinguish what is objective from what is subjective in our thoughts and words. If we achieve greater clarity and develop the positive emotion of loving-kindness we will be able to practise greater tolerance towards those who are different from us and those we disagree with, without being vague or woolly or compromising our real beliefs. We will be able to develop an attitude of patience towards both ourselves and others. Patience is the gap between our experience of being hurt and our response to being hurt. Without the gap there is simply a knee-jerk negative reaction. With the gap created by the exercise of patience there is a possibility of a more creative and positive response. One such response is forgiveness.

Forgiveness is the creative response that emerges from the gap created by patience. When we feel hurt or upset by someone, if we manage to be patient, we create time for reflection. When we reflect we may come to realise the uselessness and stupidity of retaliation, which only creates further hurt and upset. It is in the common interest of all of us to stop the endless downward spiral into anger, hatred and violence. It is in the common interest to let go of grudges and resentments.
It is in our common interests to be tolerant in the sense of being willing to allow others to have their own beliefs, their own ideas, their own thoughts and feelings. Intolerance is an unwillingness to allow others to have different beliefs, views, ideas and so on and intolerance often leads to violence, oppression and persecution. It is possible to strongly disagree with someone, to totally disagree with them, but still allow them to have their own beliefs and views. Tolerance promotes communication, not persecution. In communication there can be disagreement and a vigorous exchange of views, but this doesn't have to lead to persecution, or even to ill will.

This kind of patience and tolerance is difficult to experience and exercise. In order for it to be our attitude and perspective we will need to be deeply imbued with a world view which accepts and lives by the words of the Dhammapada “Not by hatred are hatreds ever pacified….. They are pacified by love . This is the eternal law.” (11) If this is to become our heartfelt way of being we will need to be receptive to the teachings of the Buddha, known as the Dharma. To be receptive to the Dharma means to allow yourself to be affected by the Dharma. To be affected by the Dharma, you have to hear it, reflect on it and put it into action. You have to listen creatively and make connections between what you are hearing and the day to day details of your life. It is not possible to be receptive to the Dharma unless you have some feeling for the reality of spiritual hierarchy. The Dharma as Insight and experience is mediated through concepts and images and those concepts and images come to life and are distilled into living precepts by those who have made the effort and have grown and developed spiritually. When you recognise that others are more spiritually developed than you are you can begin to learn from them. You enter into a relationship of spiritual friendship with them and through that you begin to imbibe the spirit of the Dharma as well as the letter. The spirit of the Dharma is a spirit of loving-kindness in action and of clarity of perception. The spirit of the Dharma is what is most important for transforming our lives. It is the spirit of the Dharma that we need to be receptive to. We need to allow the spirit of the Dharma to change us. Kshanti, in the form of receptivity, is an antidote to our attachment to views. We all have so many views; views about ourselves, views about others, views about the world, views about history, views about politics, views about religion, views about Buddhism even. And we are often very attached to our views, we identify with our views, indeed to some extent we are our views. The Dharma challenges our views. It challenges our views fundamentally. Most of our views and most of the views that have currency in the world are the product of unenlightened consciousness and are therefore, to say the least, limited and often simply wrong. For instance, just to take a very simple and widespread view that we are all affected by - the view that money provides security. but it is best not to think of money as something concrete, it is best to think of it as something fluid. Money is a flow of energy. It is pure potential. Money is a medium by which consciousness acts in the world. Because we are egotistic creatures and therefore spend much time and effort defending and consolidating our ego identity, we tend to channel money to this purpose too. Therefore we tend to give money the qualities of security, stability and substance. This is an extension of the delusion that gives stability and substance to our ego identity. But just as we are in reality a constantly changing process, mentally, emotionally and physically, so too is everything else in the universe including money. Seeing money as a source of stability and security is too literalistic and therefore from the point of view of the Dharma, from the standpoint of enlightened consciousness, this is a wrong view and, as such, a hindrance to spiritual progress. So we can see that the Dharma challenges deeply held views and our receptivity to the Dharma can turn us upside down and totally transform us.

The antithesis of the spirit of loving-kindness and clarity is anger and hatred. Anger is an emotion we have to thoroughly transform if we are to be of benefit to others spiritually. It is said that it is better for a spiritual aspirant to experience greed rather than hatred, because hatred denies the interconnectedness of humanity and is therefore totally opposed to all that the spiritual life is about. So the energy of hatred or anger has to be channelled in a positive direction. We need energy to practise the Dharma, to break through our hindrances, limitations and blindness. Often that energy is bound up with negative emotions, protecting our ego-identity, defending our comfort zones, blaming our suffering on others and so on. If we choose to we can use the tools of meditation, mindfulness, spiritual friendship and study to gradually channel our energy more positively, to help us break through our fears and self-imposed limitations. To do this we have to learn to be patient, to introduce a gap between any experience of being hurt or misunderstood, and our response to that experience. We need to learn to forgive others for their imperfections and insensitivity. We need to learn how to disagree without being intolerant. And we need to be receptive to the vast perspective of the Dharma and allow it to change us.

When we practise in this way, we will begin to experience something of the tranquillity and stability that is given such sublime expression in the figure of the Buddha. We will also be training ourselves in the practice of Kshanti, one of the virtues most characteristic of the saints and sages of all traditions.

This endeavour to further the evolution of human consciousness by our own efforts is the greatest work of all. In the following chapters you will find many practical suggestions and ideas to help you with this great work of spiritual transformation.

Notes:
  1. Rudyard Kipling, Kim
  2. Sangharakshita, The Ten Pillars of Buddhism, Windhorse, Glasgow 1989, p.89
  3. Kulananda, The Wheel of Life, Windhorse, Birmingham2000
  4. Sangharakshita, The Drama of Cosmic Enlightenment, Windhorse 93, p.13
  5. Sangharakshita, Seminar on Jewel Ornament of Liberation, unpublished
  6. Sangharakshita, Masculinity and Femininity in the Spiritual Life, Lions Roar, Norwich 1987, p.46
  7. Radhakrishnan (translator), The Dhammapada, OUP India 1950, p.160
  8. Robert Bly, The Sibling Society, Hamish Hamilton
  9. Sangharakshita, The Drama of Cosmic Enlightenment, p.210
  10. Jinananda, Meditating, Windhorse, Birmingham 2000
  11. Sangharakshita (translator), The Dhammapada, Windhorse 2001, p.14

No comments: